Workflow packet Time-to-fill reporting queue Greenhouse + Ashby, then Lever feed the packet before anyone starts chasing. Hiring sync

The manual reality today

  1. 01

    Reports are built by hand

    Putting together time-to-fill means exporting from the ATS and wrangling spreadsheets, often late at night before a leadership update. By the time it is ready, the data is already dated.

  2. 02

    Bottlenecks stay hidden

    Without a clear view of stage-by-stage timing, it is hard to see where roles actually stall. Teams optimize on gut feel instead of where the time really goes.

  3. 03

    Numbers are hard to trust

    When status is logged inconsistently, the metrics drawn from it are shaky. Leaders question the report instead of acting on it.

How Imagine handles it

  1. 01

    Connect your hiring data

    Pull from your ATS and calendar to gather the timing behind every role and stage. It builds on the data you already capture, kept current automatically.

  2. 02

    Measure time at each stage

    How long candidates and roles spend at every step, from application to offer, is tracked consistently. Reliable measurement replaces inconsistent manual logging.

  3. 03

    Surface bottlenecks and trends

    Where roles slow down and how time-to-fill is trending across teams and openings is highlighted automatically. Problem stages become obvious at a glance.

  4. 04

    Keep reports current

    Metrics refresh as activity happens, so the dashboard is ready whenever leadership asks. No last-minute export or cleanup required.

Works with the tools you already run

  • Greenhouse
  • Ashby
  • Lever
  • Workable
  • Google Calendar
  • BambooHR

What changes

Reporting on demand

Time-to-fill and pipeline health are always current, so you can brief stakeholders without a scramble. The report is ready when the question comes.

Bottlenecks you can fix

Clear stage-by-stage timing shows exactly where roles stall, so you can target the real constraint. Improvements are grounded in data, not guesswork.

Metrics leaders trust

Because the numbers come from consistent, live data, stakeholders act on them instead of questioning them. Conversations move to decisions faster.

Frequently asked questions

How is time-to-fill calculated?

It measures the elapsed time from when a role opens to when an offer is accepted, drawing on the dates already captured in your ATS. Because the data is read live, the figure stays current without manual recalculation.

Can I see where roles are getting stuck?

Yes. The time candidates spend at each stage is broken down, and the steps where roles consistently slow are highlighted, so you can see the real bottleneck rather than guessing at it.

Do I need to maintain a separate reporting spreadsheet?

No. Pipeline health and time-to-fill metrics are generated directly from your live ATS and calendar data, so there is no exporting or spreadsheet upkeep to keep the dashboard accurate.

Can it report across multiple roles and teams?

Yes. Time-to-fill and pipeline health roll up across every open role and team from systems like Greenhouse, Ashby, and Workable, so you can compare and brief leadership from one view.

Hand the busywork to a system you can trust.

See how Imagine handles your messiest back-office loops, end to end, with a full audit trail and your team in control.

Get Early Access No access to your systems required to start the conversation.